Syndicate: Jaka Zeleznikar: _NN - what happend?

[Syndicate admin <syndicate@v2.nl>]

Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:13:53 +0200
From: syndicate-owner@eg-r.isp-eg.de
Reply-To: syndicate-owner@eg-r.isp-eg.de
Subject: BOUNCE syndicate@eg-r.isp-eg.de:     Admin request of type /
\buns\w*b/i at line 3
To: syndicate@v2.nl

Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:07:03 +0200
From: Jaka Zeleznikar <jaka@jaka.org>
Organization: http://www.jaka.org
To: syndicate <syndicate@eg-r.isp-eg.de>
Subject: _NN - what happend?


I was unsubscribed from the Syndicate for approximately a month because
i went to travel in Turkey (and i recommend traveling in Turkey very
much + they have a lot of cybercafes but i just wished to be off line
all the time).

When i returned and subscribed again i found a lot of mails against NN
and if i understood correctly NN was removed from Syndicate by
administrators?

If this is correct i protest.

Why censorship?

I never saw a notice how to make a mail filter so those who don't like
NN postings can joust automatically get rid of them.

I liked most of NN mails. They were very precise and strict regarding
own 'ideology', interesting in design and with very nice language-game
involved. Done by 'hand' of by computer program i don't care.

Was NN not politically/syndicate correct? Who else is not syndicate
correct? Will administrators ban another person? When and why?

Is wrong to post things like that:

  e       R   l   a   e   o   a   i   j   a       v   i       i  
m       o   s   j   l       o   a   s   i   t       f   e   i   e   i  
e   ?   b   h   o   .   e   e       g   n   n   j   o   r   z   n   v  
s   e   t       i   p   n   a   ?       j   a   n   d       e   i   j  
e   v   n   o   i   p   r       s   r       e       g   n   d   a   s  
t   /   e   t   i   o   n   v   m       g   t   t       o   u   i   o  
v           o   n   s   k   i   n   z   i   n   m   j       o   v   b  
d       o   u   o       g   u   o   
 ? n a ( D ) A e s n r   l b k r n   z e n   e p   s b n , v l k   e o p
z r o t   e m a a a t r c   o v t l   u i g a i n m   z l d   n t h i
n   r z i n s i   s b n   o p e l d o i     a n , p e o n v o a t r k  
s e s o l n j   o a e n   a i , k   e l s e   e i u - b s d l   e s s a
l e o p   r n i u m e e i   e p e o p v z v p e l d o o p r     p e n m
i t r e n k m d d t i   i o , k d u i   e a s o d p l j j ? m p g a j m
a i k d d t i   k i o n m i   i a n m i f r a i a , k   s o n   e e i o
d p l j j j   n n d r j j j . 
    k   C       k   d   G   o       i   m   l   o   e   i   e   o   r  
o   n   i       d   v   i   p   e   a   d   r   ?   u   g   u       n  
i   e   b   t   V   i   s   r   e       z   s       p   a       o   o  
t   k   i   o   d       n   n   i       t   m   j       e   o       t  
j       p   c       ?   n       k   o   a   r   e       i   k   l   i  
n   n   s       a   m   r       r   m   m   k   o   n   o       l   e  
l       a   m   l   v       v   l       o   c   m   i   n   o   s   l  
o   n   e   i   a   a   e    


or is it wrong to post 'to much'?

Where are clearly written rules of the syndicate game? And if syndicate
is really non hierarchic 'society' of equal members (which i understood
from different presentations of S.) who made a decision to ban somebody?

I dint's saw mails to ban some people who made some stupid and insulting
remarks of NN.

Is there now a special state of mind required to be on syndicate list?

Is there no other solution to deal with different wishes about
moderation, something like on Rhizome with 'raw' and 'digest'. I found
this more intelligent solution than to ban people.


If i got something wrong and i insulted somebody i apologize.

jaka zeleznikar




-----Syndicate mailinglist--------------------
Syndicate network for media culture and media art
information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate
to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate@eg-r.isp-eg.de>
to unsubscribe, write to <majordomo@eg-r.isp-eg.de>, in
the body of the msg: unsubscribe syndicate your@email.adress